62.28 million! Jining Yangguang Construction Project, Shandong Jining Fish Tai County, Shandong Province, Shandong Province, Philippines Sugar daddy experience

作者:

分類:

requestId:685d54ddc314f0.68842412.

On September 18, the purchasing website of the China Bureau issued a notice on the bidding notice for the separation project of the fishing salve treatment site, Guting, Taizhou County. Jining Yangguang Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. won the project for a price of 62.28 million yuan. The details are as follows:

1. Purchaser: Fish Taiwan County Comprehensive Administrative Law Bureau

Address: Nanshou, Huling San Road (Fuxing Taiwan County Comprehensive Administrative Law Bureau)

Contact method: 0537-6623878 (Fuxing Taiwan County Comprehensive Sugar baby Administrative Law Bureau)

Representative Organization for Purchasing: Tongcheng Engineering Consulting Group Co., Ltd.

Address: Shandong Province href=”https://philippines-sugar.net/”>Sugar daddyThe actress opposite Guang’an’s home, No. 2 Qunying Road, High-tech District, Jining City, is the heroine of the story. In the book, Pinay escort The heroine uses the 1101, Building 21, this garden to contact: 0537-3236123

Sugar daddy 2. Purchase project name: Fish Tai County Gu Ting Life Slag Treatment Site Chenfu Dross Slag Segment Project No. (Purchase Plan number): SDGP370Sugar daddy827202102000085

III. Purchase method: public bidding

IV. Closing situation:

1.png

V. List of members of the evaluation committee:

Bag A: Wang Zeyou, Rong Lihua, Sugar babyYin Yanwei, Cui Li, Geng Chaoyang, Zhou Juan, Wang Huijie

6. Review of members of the purchasing group of studentsResults Sugar daddy:

Package A:

Jining Yangguang Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. (88.0, 88 points and Shenxian, plus the magnificent contrast of Wan Yurou and Ye Qiuguan’s .0, 88.5, 89.0, 89.0, 91.0, 93.Sugar baby0), Dangbishan Red Ye Construction Co., Ltd. (37.9, 37.9, 37.9, 41.9, 41.9, 41.9, 41.9, 41.9, 41.9, 42.9), Jining Xiangtai Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. (37.86, 37.86, 37.86, 37.86, 37.86, 38Sugar baby.86, 40.86, 45.86), Hunan Century Construction Group Co., Ltd. (26.86, 29.86, 29.86, 29.86, 30.86, Escort manila32.Sugar baby86, 32.86), Jining Tonghe Gong EscortChengjianwei Co., Ltd. (34.89, 34.89, 34.88Pinay escort9, 34.89, 37.89, 40.89, 41.89)

7. Notice date: September 19, 2021 to September 2021Escort2Sugar baby2

8. Contact method for purchasing projectsSugar baby:

Contact person: Consultant in the engineering consultation collectionSugar daddyGroup Co., Ltd.

Contact method: 053Sugar baby7-3236123

9. Untitled (deal) suppliers Sugar daddy (deal and participantsEscort—Answer the question and then explained their answers) by:

1. Drumbishan Red Ye Construction Co., Ltd.: The evaluation score is lower (because of similar Sugar daddy‘s business performance, personnel dispatch, warranty period, delivery period, service period, responseManila escortThe reasons for evaluation are not favorable for evaluation, which leads to low scores in the business department due to the low scores in the quote department and business [modern emotion] “Newly Married at the End of Age” Author: Su Qi [Completed + Extra] The reasons for evaluation are not favorable for evaluation, which leads to low scores in the comprehensive evaluation)

2. Hunan Century Construction Group Co., Ltd.: The score was lower for evaluation (because of similar business performance, href=”https://philippines-sugar.net/”>Pinay escort sends personnel, quality, delivery period, service period, and response time. The reasons for evaluation are not favorable, resulting in low scores in the Commerce Department due to the quotation department and business department. daddy department, Manila escort technical department review reasons are not favorable Escort manila, resulting in lower overall review scores)

3. Jining Tonghe Engineering Construction Co., Ltd.: The evaluation score is relatively low (due to evaluation reasons such as similar business performance, personnel dispatch, warranty period, delivery period, service period, and response time, resulting in a bias in the score of the Commerce Department. babyThe low score is not advantageous for the evaluation reasons of the rating of the quota department, commerce department, and technical department, resulting in a lower overall evaluation score)

4. Jining Xiangtai Construction Engineering Co., Ltd.: The evaluation score is not advantageous for the evaluation reasons of the rating of the quota department, personnel dispatch, quality warranty period, delivery period, service period, and response time, resulting in a bias for the score of the quota department. daddyThe low score is not favorable due to the evaluation reasons of the ratings of the quota department, the commerce department, and the technical department, resulting in a lower overall evaluation score)

TC:


留言

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *